Horn Dog Herman Cain is now starting to have a Tiger Woods moment, and no, it's not because he's good at golf. A third woman has come forward and said that Horny Herman tried to put the moves on her, inviting her to his corporate apartment "love nest", presumably to tell her how she could climb his corporate ladder.
Unlike Tiger Woods, Cain seems unable to sink any of his putts, but he does seem to like swinging the club around. I think his favorite club is a 9 9 9 iron. Or maybe a 6 and a 9 iron, and a couple of woods. Poor guy just can't seem to get the ball in the hole.
BTW, I had already predicted that there would likely be more women, and I suspect that this will not be the end either. I also suspect that the two other women who are currently being "gagged" by Herman's lawyers will find a way to get their stories out there.
Hey, has anyone else noticed that Herman is starting to grow his laurel wreath afro to hide his demonic horns?
Showing posts with label 999 plan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 999 plan. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Herman Cain ContraDictionary To Reach 999 Entries by Xmas
For a guy with a degree in math, Herman Cain has a remarkably poor grasp of elementary logic and the concept of contradiction. This is perhaps more evidence that Herman Cain is now possessed by the Devil and is therefore the Antichrist, since he displays no aptitude for his former ability to use mathematical reasoning. For example, Cain has claimed that, "Our Constitution guarantees the separation of church and state". Yet Cain sees no problem with publicly funding "prayer in schools", or giving them the ability to "display the Ten Commandments", and he wants to make sure that "under God" remains in the Pledge of Allegiance. He even has no problem with legislators being "sworn in" using the Holy Bible.
However, this apparent generosity does not extent to the Koran. He had a fit when Keith Ellison was sworn in as a member of Congress using the Koran. Furthermore, he thinks the people of Murfreesburo, Tennessee should be able to vote to ban construction of a Mosque. So much for wanting to get government off our backs, like he claims in his 999 plan. In fact, he told Chris Wallace, "That’s not discriminating based upon religion", though presumably, a community of Muslims voting to ban the construction of a Baptist church would be "crucifying Jesus all over again".
By the way, did you hear that Cain thinks that Liberals killed Jesus. Yep. He wrote in redstate.com that a, " liberal court found [Jesus] guilty of false offences [sic] and sentenced Him to death", even though liberals don't believe in capital punishment, and he acknowledges that Jesus "was not read any Miranda Rights". Where was the ACLU when Jesus needed them? Probably defending Barabbas or something. Oh, and it's also not discriminating on the basis of religion that Cain says that he would refuse to have any Muslims in his cabinet in the nightmare scenario of him actually becoming president.
He was for building an electric fence to keep out Mexican before he declared it to be a joke, and then said actually he was NOT joking. He did say that "America needs to get a sense of humor", though, especially so they can learn to laugh about things that he says he was totally NOT joking about.
On the topic of abortion he says, "As to my political policy view on abortion, I am 100% pro-life. End of story," and yet when asked if he would support a legal ban on women having abortions he says, "That's her choice. That is not government's choice." He then clarifies his statement by saying, "No, abortion should not be legal.". Clear as mud, isn't it?
It just goes on and on. Cain says, "If you don't have a job and you're not rich, blame yourself." Unless, of course you feel like blaming "the failed policies of the Obama administration" for trying to fix the economic collapse that Wall Street is totally NOT at fault for causing, and that you should be blaming yourself for.
You got all that. Good, because the Hermanator (yes, he actually calls himself that) is just getting started. If he were our president he would rack up more misstatements of fact and errors in logic in the first 100 days of office than George W. Bush achieved in 8 years. Perhaps the 999 in his plan is referring to his goal of reaching 999 contradictions by Christmas of this year. It think that's one plan that he's actually capable of implementing.
However, this apparent generosity does not extent to the Koran. He had a fit when Keith Ellison was sworn in as a member of Congress using the Koran. Furthermore, he thinks the people of Murfreesburo, Tennessee should be able to vote to ban construction of a Mosque. So much for wanting to get government off our backs, like he claims in his 999 plan. In fact, he told Chris Wallace, "That’s not discriminating based upon religion", though presumably, a community of Muslims voting to ban the construction of a Baptist church would be "crucifying Jesus all over again".
By the way, did you hear that Cain thinks that Liberals killed Jesus. Yep. He wrote in redstate.com that a, " liberal court found [Jesus] guilty of false offences [sic] and sentenced Him to death", even though liberals don't believe in capital punishment, and he acknowledges that Jesus "was not read any Miranda Rights". Where was the ACLU when Jesus needed them? Probably defending Barabbas or something. Oh, and it's also not discriminating on the basis of religion that Cain says that he would refuse to have any Muslims in his cabinet in the nightmare scenario of him actually becoming president.
He was for building an electric fence to keep out Mexican before he declared it to be a joke, and then said actually he was NOT joking. He did say that "America needs to get a sense of humor", though, especially so they can learn to laugh about things that he says he was totally NOT joking about.
On the topic of abortion he says, "As to my political policy view on abortion, I am 100% pro-life. End of story," and yet when asked if he would support a legal ban on women having abortions he says, "That's her choice. That is not government's choice." He then clarifies his statement by saying, "No, abortion should not be legal.". Clear as mud, isn't it?
It just goes on and on. Cain says, "If you don't have a job and you're not rich, blame yourself." Unless, of course you feel like blaming "the failed policies of the Obama administration" for trying to fix the economic collapse that Wall Street is totally NOT at fault for causing, and that you should be blaming yourself for.
You got all that. Good, because the Hermanator (yes, he actually calls himself that) is just getting started. If he were our president he would rack up more misstatements of fact and errors in logic in the first 100 days of office than George W. Bush achieved in 8 years. Perhaps the 999 in his plan is referring to his goal of reaching 999 contradictions by Christmas of this year. It think that's one plan that he's actually capable of implementing.
Saturday, October 22, 2011
Herman 999 Cain Exposes Big Lie of "Small Government" GOP on Abortion
Herman Cain may finally start to be seen as the Antichrist that he is by Republicans, because he exposed the schizophrenic Big Lie that Republicans stand for small government when it comes to the topic of abortion. Now, you may be saying, of course Republicans are for small government. That's virtually every other word out of their mouth these days. Aside from abortion, it's almost all they have left of the empty shell that used to be so-called conservative ideology. Their small minds love to hate on big government precisely because it is too big for them to wrap their tiny minds around. .
Ah but Herman Cain managed to clusterf**k both issues at the same time when he infamously commented that, "it's not the government's role or anybody else's role to make that decision," when it comes to abortion, despite the fact that he claims to be personally opposed to abortion. That is, He Cain says, "My position is that I'm 100% pro-life. Period," and yet, when asked about whether a woman should be allowed to terminate a pregnancy then his "Period" turns into an ellipsis (i.e. "...") and he says, "That's her choice. That is not government's choice."
What's this? Pro-choice and Pro-life at the same time? But we've always been told that these positions are completely irreconcilable. Actually Cain is not the first person to suggest that you can be personally opposed to abortion, but not believe that the government should dictate this to others. A number of Democrats, such as Mario Cuomo, have made similar arguments.
Of course Cain is the only "small government" Republican out there today who thinks that it's not the governments role to regulate abortion. For that reason, every other Republican in the race, from "man-on-dog" Santorum, to Perry and Romney is jumping all over Cain about his apparent double standard.
Furthermore, it's not clear that Cain knows what side of his mouth he is talking out of at a given time, because in the same interview he also stated, "No, abortion should not be legal." But I thought it wasn't government's role and how would it be made illegal without the government? Apparently here he is trying to weasel words and suggest that there "should" be a law, hypothetically, but that, in the actual world we live in, government's role is not to dictate that. That's the only way I can begin to make sense of his otherwise incoherent set of statements.
Consider the example of freedom of speech. A religious person might claim that blasphemy is "wrong" and that it "should be illegal" but that our current, Constitutional form of government guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of religion, so it is not the government's role to make these kinds of laws and/or choices for people.
Unfortunately for Mr. Cain, Republicans "don't do nuance". That's why simple-minded things like the 999 plan appealed to them so much. To now give them a complicated word game about how you're pro-life, but also pro-choice, and that you think that it "should" be illegal in principle in a perfect world, but that, in the present, imperfect world, government can't actually do it, would be enough to make 99% of Republicans heads explode.
However, that might be exactly what Cain wants as the Antichrist. With most Republicans neutralized it will be relatively easy for him to beat up on the hippie peacenik liberals and wishy-washy "independents" who are left.
Ah but Herman Cain managed to clusterf**k both issues at the same time when he infamously commented that, "it's not the government's role or anybody else's role to make that decision," when it comes to abortion, despite the fact that he claims to be personally opposed to abortion. That is, He Cain says, "My position is that I'm 100% pro-life. Period," and yet, when asked about whether a woman should be allowed to terminate a pregnancy then his "Period" turns into an ellipsis (i.e. "...") and he says, "That's her choice. That is not government's choice."
What's this? Pro-choice and Pro-life at the same time? But we've always been told that these positions are completely irreconcilable. Actually Cain is not the first person to suggest that you can be personally opposed to abortion, but not believe that the government should dictate this to others. A number of Democrats, such as Mario Cuomo, have made similar arguments.
Of course Cain is the only "small government" Republican out there today who thinks that it's not the governments role to regulate abortion. For that reason, every other Republican in the race, from "man-on-dog" Santorum, to Perry and Romney is jumping all over Cain about his apparent double standard.
Furthermore, it's not clear that Cain knows what side of his mouth he is talking out of at a given time, because in the same interview he also stated, "No, abortion should not be legal." But I thought it wasn't government's role and how would it be made illegal without the government? Apparently here he is trying to weasel words and suggest that there "should" be a law, hypothetically, but that, in the actual world we live in, government's role is not to dictate that. That's the only way I can begin to make sense of his otherwise incoherent set of statements.
Consider the example of freedom of speech. A religious person might claim that blasphemy is "wrong" and that it "should be illegal" but that our current, Constitutional form of government guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of religion, so it is not the government's role to make these kinds of laws and/or choices for people.
Unfortunately for Mr. Cain, Republicans "don't do nuance". That's why simple-minded things like the 999 plan appealed to them so much. To now give them a complicated word game about how you're pro-life, but also pro-choice, and that you think that it "should" be illegal in principle in a perfect world, but that, in the present, imperfect world, government can't actually do it, would be enough to make 99% of Republicans heads explode.
However, that might be exactly what Cain wants as the Antichrist. With most Republicans neutralized it will be relatively easy for him to beat up on the hippie peacenik liberals and wishy-washy "independents" who are left.
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
AP Says Cain's 999 Plan would raise taxes on poor by 950%
According to a new AP report, people making $10,000 to $20,000 per year would see their taxes go up 950% under Herman Cain's Satanic 999 Plan. People in middle incomes between $40000 and $75000 per year would see their tax bills increase by over $4000 per year. In all, 84% of current tax payers would see an increase in their taxes. However, guess which group would benefit. Yep, you guessed it, the ultra wealthy. They would pay far less in taxes than they do today. "Well Surprise, Surprise!", as a person with the biblical name Gomer used to say. That's because Cain's Welfare for the Rich plan makes sure to exempt investment income from being taxed at all. You can't get more anti-Christian than increasing the tax burden by 950% on the poor, while lowering them for the rich. But what do you expect from Antichrist Herman Cain.
Herman 999 Cain Moronically Claims Liberal Court Killed Jesus
Herman Cain's 999 Plan really reads 666 because CAIN has his head up his A$$ and that's what it looks like to him. More proof of this is his utterly moronic and blasphemous revisionism of history as when he wrote in Redstate.com that a " liberal court found [Jesus] guilty of false offences [sic] and sentenced Him to death". Apparently, this certifiable retard, Herman Cain, has forgotten that LIBERALS OPPOSE CAPITAL PUNISHMENT. Conservatives SUPPORT CAPITAL PUNISHMENT. So a LIBERAL COURT would not IMPOSE THE DEATH PENALTY. A CONSERVATIVE court would SENTENCE JESUS TO CRUCIFIXION for blasphemy. Liberals would have considered CRUCIFIXION as CRUEL AND/OR UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT and they support freedom of speech and freedom of religion, so they would not have considered blasphemy even against the law. A Liberal court would have had Jesus out on parole in five minutes.
Cain then continued to demolish his ridiculous case by noting that Jesus, "was not read any Miranda Rights". A liberal court would have THROWN OUT THE CHARGES. A conservative court would not care if Jesus was beaten and tortured. Cain then notes that Jesus "didn’t have a lawyer". Again, this would have been a violation of Miranda and would have been GROUNDS FOR ACQUITTAL in a LIBERAL COURT. In a conservative court they would have said, if you're "not rich, blame yourself" for not being able to afford a laywer. In fact, that's also a direct quote from a total dumbf**k conservative named HERMAN CAIN. A liberal court would have appointed him a public defender.
Cain's article mercilessly makes a fool of himself on every level, and is extremely blasphemous. He claims, for example, that Jesus "was unemployed". However, in reality Jesus was working hard every day as a preacher and a healer of the sick. That is not being "unemployed". He claims that Jesus helped the poor "without one government program", but actually Jesus was a member of the BIGGEST GOVERNMENT IN THE UNIVERSE called the KINGDOM OF GOD. How is a KINGDOM not a government? In fact, He was the head of that government and used His influence to get His Father to multiply fish and loaves and to give people free government health care without having to pay for it, like CONSERVATIVES DEMAND.
Jesus spoke very disapprovingly of the rich, saying, "it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God" (Mt 19:24). Cain says that poor people are just lazy and jealous. Since when did Jesus teach that you should never help poor people because they are just lazy and jealous.
Cain thinks Jesus was a "perfect conservative". However, I don't recall Jesus preaching that you should carry firearms and retaliate instantly if anyone offended you. In fact, Jesus was very much for "sword control". For example, when he was being arrested Simon Peter drew a sword and cut off the ear of the servant of the High Priest. Did Jesus say, "Yeehaw, boy, get 'er done! Go kill all those mofos trying to arrest me!" No, not exactly. Not even close. That's what a conservative like Cain would have said. Instead he bitterly rebuked Simon Peter saying "Put your sword back in its place", and that "all who draw the sword will die by the sword". He then healed the ear of the servant of the High Priest. Contrary to popular belief and revisionism Jesus was not a fan of violence or armed rebellion. He taught pacifism and loving your enemy. That's what those peacenik, pinko, liberals believe in. Sorry Cain, but you are a false prophet preaching a false christ as Mk 13:21 warned about. This is yet more evidence that HERMAN CAIN IS THE ANTICHRIST.
Cain then continued to demolish his ridiculous case by noting that Jesus, "was not read any Miranda Rights". A liberal court would have THROWN OUT THE CHARGES. A conservative court would not care if Jesus was beaten and tortured. Cain then notes that Jesus "didn’t have a lawyer". Again, this would have been a violation of Miranda and would have been GROUNDS FOR ACQUITTAL in a LIBERAL COURT. In a conservative court they would have said, if you're "not rich, blame yourself" for not being able to afford a laywer. In fact, that's also a direct quote from a total dumbf**k conservative named HERMAN CAIN. A liberal court would have appointed him a public defender.
Cain's article mercilessly makes a fool of himself on every level, and is extremely blasphemous. He claims, for example, that Jesus "was unemployed". However, in reality Jesus was working hard every day as a preacher and a healer of the sick. That is not being "unemployed". He claims that Jesus helped the poor "without one government program", but actually Jesus was a member of the BIGGEST GOVERNMENT IN THE UNIVERSE called the KINGDOM OF GOD. How is a KINGDOM not a government? In fact, He was the head of that government and used His influence to get His Father to multiply fish and loaves and to give people free government health care without having to pay for it, like CONSERVATIVES DEMAND.
Jesus spoke very disapprovingly of the rich, saying, "it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God" (Mt 19:24). Cain says that poor people are just lazy and jealous. Since when did Jesus teach that you should never help poor people because they are just lazy and jealous.
Cain thinks Jesus was a "perfect conservative". However, I don't recall Jesus preaching that you should carry firearms and retaliate instantly if anyone offended you. In fact, Jesus was very much for "sword control". For example, when he was being arrested Simon Peter drew a sword and cut off the ear of the servant of the High Priest. Did Jesus say, "Yeehaw, boy, get 'er done! Go kill all those mofos trying to arrest me!" No, not exactly. Not even close. That's what a conservative like Cain would have said. Instead he bitterly rebuked Simon Peter saying "Put your sword back in its place", and that "all who draw the sword will die by the sword". He then healed the ear of the servant of the High Priest. Contrary to popular belief and revisionism Jesus was not a fan of violence or armed rebellion. He taught pacifism and loving your enemy. That's what those peacenik, pinko, liberals believe in. Sorry Cain, but you are a false prophet preaching a false christ as Mk 13:21 warned about. This is yet more evidence that HERMAN CAIN IS THE ANTICHRIST.
Friday, October 14, 2011
More Evidence that Cain is the Antichrist from Medieval Art
It's interesting that, since Herman Cain has come out with his 999 plan, only a tiny number of Christians seem to be concerned about this being the Mark of the Beast. It's also interesting, that historically, Satan and the Antichrist have been depicted in Medieval Christian art with a dark or black complexion. Of course, this was used against Obama, but it seems to apply more aptly to Cain, since he is the one using a variant of 666 in his central campaign pledge. Republican were absolutely convinced that Obama was the Antichrist on the basis of complexion alone. Yet they are falling all over themselves to embrace Herman Cain who far better matches descriptions of the Antichrist with his arrogant, blasphemous speech and his unshakable faith in money, rather than God, as the savior of Mankind.
Herman Cain 999 and the Blasphemy of GodFather's Pizza
Herman "The Beast" Cain has effected an almost supernatural, come from behind surge in the GOP polls, with the adoption of his Satanic 999 Plan, that he wants to stamp on the hands and foreheads of anyone who votes for him. Of course it is just a thinly veiled version of 666, turned on its head so that right wingers will be too dumb to see it. Most of them aren't exactly the sharpest tacks, but even a few of them have started to catch on to something as obvious as this. Revelation 13:1 says of the AntiChrist, "upon his head is the name of blasphemy". Think about it. He was the "head" (CEO) of GodFather's Pizza. Could it not be considered blasphemy to use the name of God the Father together with selling Pizza? Decide that one for yourself.
Thursday, October 13, 2011
999 Anti-Christ Cain Tied with Plastic Haired Mormon Romney
Republicans voters are on the horns (literally) of a dilemma. Cain and Romney are tied., according to the latest poll. Who will they vote for, someone who trots out his Satanic Mark of the Beast 999 tax plan, or a plastic haired Mormon who believes that God lives on the planet Kolob and probably has a secret harem larger than Warren Jeffs? One wonders what the fundamentalist Christians must be thinking when Rick Perry, the only actual "washed in the blood" Bible (il)Literalist of the bunch, is only polling at 9%. If this is not proof that Republicans would sell their souls (again literally) because of their hatred of Obama then what is? Imagine if Barack Obama had trotted out a plan like the 666 Universal Healthcare Plan? I doubt that would put him at the top of GOP polls like it has with Cain.
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
Is Cain's 999 Plan The Mark of the Beast or Pizza Promotional?
Herman Cain is proposing an overhaul of the American tax system that he calls the 999 Plan. If this sounds like a pizza promotional, well, what do you expect from the former CEO of Godfather's Pizza? Please hold the jokes about the whether the plan comes with extra toppings, garlic bread, and a large drink. However, other people are a little more concerned about the potentially sinister numerical significance. 999 is considered by many to be a variant of 666, which has traditionally been called the "mark of the beast", at least according to conventional biblical translations of Revelation 13:18, which say, "Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number [is] Six hundred threescore [and] six". This is supposedly the number or seal used by the Antichrist to mark himself and all those who cooperate with him.
Interestingly, verse one of Revelation 13 also may apply to Cain, because it says, in part, "upon his head is the name of blasphemy". Well, Cain, as you will recall was the murderous brother of Abel, and the biblical Cain was given the Mark of Cain, as per Genesis 4:15. The name Cain might therefore be considered blasphemous in itself, since it is the name of the first murderer who rebelled against Yahweh.
Of course, Herman Cain says it's just his flat tax rate proposal where each individual would pay 9% income tax, corporations would pay 9%, and there would be a 9% sales tax. As the link above notes, this would absolutely wallop the poor, because he wants to make it so that everyone has to pay it and many poor people end up paying no income tax after deductions. Furthermore, this 9% federal sales tax would be on top of the sales taxes charged by many states. In fact there are also some cities that charge sales tax. So people could end up being charged state, federal, and municipal sales tax on a purchase. Naturally, wage earners on the bottom rungs would take the largest hit from this because they usually spend all of their incomes on necessities like food, gas, etc.
So even if Cain's 999 plan is not a satanic conspiracy, making Herman Cain the Antichrist, it would be extremely bad for anyone but the richest of the rich. Cain has made it very clear, from day 1 that the super-rich are the only people he cares about. That's why his 999 plan shields all investor income. Jesus spoke of helping the poor. Cain is the antithesis of Jesus in that he only cares about helping the rich.
Note: I am NOT saying that I take Revelation 13:18 seriously, or that I believe that it is an authentic prophecy. Many serious students of Christian theology have concluded that the 666 reference, which is alternately 616 in some of the oldest translations, was a likely reference to the Roman emperor Nero, who was well known for his persecution of the early Christian church. Nero, if the tales of his actions were true, would fit the bill as an "Antichrist", in the sense of being anti-Christian, far better than many of the people who have been labeled possible antichrists over the intervening centuries and millennia since this prophecy has gone unfulfilled.
In modern times, people have come up with all kinds of fanciful conspiracy theories, claim that 666 shows up in barcodes, or that these digits will be embedded in chips which are implanted inside of people as an alternative to money.
Interestingly, verse one of Revelation 13 also may apply to Cain, because it says, in part, "upon his head is the name of blasphemy". Well, Cain, as you will recall was the murderous brother of Abel, and the biblical Cain was given the Mark of Cain, as per Genesis 4:15. The name Cain might therefore be considered blasphemous in itself, since it is the name of the first murderer who rebelled against Yahweh.
Of course, Herman Cain says it's just his flat tax rate proposal where each individual would pay 9% income tax, corporations would pay 9%, and there would be a 9% sales tax. As the link above notes, this would absolutely wallop the poor, because he wants to make it so that everyone has to pay it and many poor people end up paying no income tax after deductions. Furthermore, this 9% federal sales tax would be on top of the sales taxes charged by many states. In fact there are also some cities that charge sales tax. So people could end up being charged state, federal, and municipal sales tax on a purchase. Naturally, wage earners on the bottom rungs would take the largest hit from this because they usually spend all of their incomes on necessities like food, gas, etc.
So even if Cain's 999 plan is not a satanic conspiracy, making Herman Cain the Antichrist, it would be extremely bad for anyone but the richest of the rich. Cain has made it very clear, from day 1 that the super-rich are the only people he cares about. That's why his 999 plan shields all investor income. Jesus spoke of helping the poor. Cain is the antithesis of Jesus in that he only cares about helping the rich.
Note: I am NOT saying that I take Revelation 13:18 seriously, or that I believe that it is an authentic prophecy. Many serious students of Christian theology have concluded that the 666 reference, which is alternately 616 in some of the oldest translations, was a likely reference to the Roman emperor Nero, who was well known for his persecution of the early Christian church. Nero, if the tales of his actions were true, would fit the bill as an "Antichrist", in the sense of being anti-Christian, far better than many of the people who have been labeled possible antichrists over the intervening centuries and millennia since this prophecy has gone unfulfilled.
In modern times, people have come up with all kinds of fanciful conspiracy theories, claim that 666 shows up in barcodes, or that these digits will be embedded in chips which are implanted inside of people as an alternative to money.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)