Herman 999 Cain Exposes Big Lie of "Small Government" GOP on Abortion

Herman Cain may finally start to be seen as the Antichrist that he is by Republicans, because he exposed the schizophrenic Big Lie that Republicans stand for small government when it comes to the topic of abortion. Now, you may be saying, of course Republicans are for small government.  That's virtually every other word out of their mouth these days.  Aside from abortion, it's almost all they have left of the empty shell that used to be so-called conservative ideology.  Their small minds love to hate on big government precisely because it is too big for them to wrap their tiny minds around.  .

Ah but Herman Cain managed to clusterf**k both issues at the same time when he infamously commented that, "it's not the government's role or anybody else's role to make that decision," when it comes to abortion, despite the fact that he claims to be personally opposed to abortion.  That is, He Cain says, "My position is that I'm 100% pro-life. Period," and yet, when asked about whether a woman should be allowed to terminate a pregnancy then his "Period" turns into an ellipsis (i.e. "...")  and he says, "That's her choice. That is not government's choice."

What's this?  Pro-choice and Pro-life at the same time?  But we've always been told that these positions are completely irreconcilable.  Actually Cain is not the first person to suggest that you can be personally opposed to abortion, but not believe that the government should dictate this to others.  A number of Democrats, such as Mario Cuomo, have made similar arguments.

Of course Cain is the only "small government" Republican out there today who thinks that it's not the governments role to regulate abortion.  For that reason, every other Republican in the race, from "man-on-dog" Santorum, to Perry and Romney is jumping all over Cain about his apparent double standard.

Furthermore, it's not clear that Cain knows what side of his mouth he is talking out of at a given time, because in the same interview he also stated, "No, abortion should not be legal." But I thought it wasn't government's role and how would it be made illegal without the government? Apparently here he is trying to weasel words and suggest that there "should" be a law, hypothetically, but that, in the actual world we live in, government's role is not to dictate that.  That's the only way I can begin to make sense of his otherwise incoherent set of statements.

Consider the example of freedom of speech.  A religious person might claim that blasphemy is "wrong" and that it "should be illegal" but that our current, Constitutional form of government guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of religion, so it is not the government's role to make these kinds of laws and/or choices for people.

Unfortunately for Mr. Cain, Republicans "don't do nuance".  That's why simple-minded things like the 999 plan appealed to  them so much.  To now give them a complicated word game about how you're pro-life, but also pro-choice, and that you think that it "should" be illegal in principle in a perfect world, but that, in the present, imperfect world, government can't actually do it, would be enough to make 99% of Republicans heads explode.

However, that might be exactly what Cain wants as the Antichrist.  With most Republicans neutralized it will be relatively easy for him to beat up on the hippie peacenik liberals and wishy-washy  "independents" who are left.

Herman 999 Cain Moronically Claims Liberal Court Killed Jesus

Herman Cain's 999 Plan really reads 666 because CAIN has his head up his A$$ and that's what it looks like to him.  More proof of this is his utterly moronic and blasphemous revisionism of history as when he wrote in Redstate.com that a " liberal court found [Jesus] guilty of false offences [sic] and sentenced Him to death".  Apparently, this certifiable retard, Herman Cain, has forgotten that LIBERALS OPPOSE CAPITAL PUNISHMENT.  Conservatives SUPPORT CAPITAL PUNISHMENT.  So a LIBERAL COURT would not IMPOSE THE DEATH PENALTY.  A CONSERVATIVE court would SENTENCE JESUS TO CRUCIFIXION for blasphemy.  Liberals would have considered CRUCIFIXION as CRUEL AND/OR UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT and they support freedom of speech and freedom of religion, so they would not have considered blasphemy even against the law.  A Liberal court would have had Jesus out on parole in five minutes.

Cain then continued to demolish his ridiculous case by noting that Jesus, "was not read any Miranda Rights".  A liberal court would have THROWN OUT THE CHARGES.  A conservative court would not care if Jesus was beaten and tortured.  Cain then notes that Jesus "didn’t have a lawyer".  Again, this would have been a violation of Miranda and would have been GROUNDS FOR ACQUITTAL in a LIBERAL COURT.  In a conservative court they would have said, if you're "not rich, blame yourself" for not being able to afford a laywer.  In fact, that's also a direct quote from a total dumbf**k conservative named HERMAN CAIN.  A liberal court would have appointed him a public defender.

Cain's article mercilessly makes a fool of himself on every level, and is extremely blasphemous.  He claims, for example, that Jesus "was unemployed".  However, in reality Jesus was working hard every day as a preacher and a healer of the sick.  That is not being "unemployed".  He claims that Jesus helped the poor "without one government program", but actually Jesus was a member of the BIGGEST GOVERNMENT IN THE UNIVERSE called the KINGDOM OF GOD.  How is a KINGDOM not a government?  In fact, He was the head of that government and used His influence to get His Father to multiply fish and loaves and to give people free government health care without having to pay for it, like CONSERVATIVES DEMAND.

Jesus spoke very disapprovingly of the rich, saying, "it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God" (Mt 19:24).  Cain says that poor people are just lazy and jealous.  Since when did Jesus teach that you should never help poor people because they are just lazy and jealous.

Cain thinks Jesus was a "perfect conservative".  However, I don't recall Jesus preaching that you should carry firearms and retaliate instantly if anyone offended you.  In fact, Jesus was very much for "sword control".  For example, when he was being arrested Simon Peter drew a sword and cut off the ear of the servant of the High Priest.  Did Jesus say, "Yeehaw, boy, get 'er done! Go kill all those mofos trying to arrest me!"  No, not exactly.  Not even close.  That's what a conservative like Cain would have said.  Instead he bitterly rebuked Simon Peter saying "Put your sword back in its place", and that "all who draw the sword will die by the sword".  He then healed the ear of the servant of the High Priest.  Contrary to popular belief and revisionism Jesus was not a fan of violence or armed rebellion.  He taught pacifism and loving your enemy.  That's what those peacenik, pinko, liberals believe in.  Sorry Cain, but you are a false prophet preaching a false christ as Mk 13:21 warned about.  This is yet more evidence that HERMAN CAIN IS THE ANTICHRIST.

666 Antichrist Cain Wants to Build Electric Fence To Enslave America

Herman 666 Cain  is now claiming he was joking when he suggested that we should build an electric fence on the border to control immigration.  Of course, any fence that keeps people OUT also locks them IN, which might be the actual reason he favors such a fence, since Cain doesn't want us fleeing to Mexico when he reveals himself as the Antichrist.   Just like the previous Evil Empire, the Soviet Union, Cain seems to want to build an electrified version of the Iron Curtain to control the American populace. I also suspect that, if one looked carefully at the chain link pattern on that fence that touching it would brand 666 onto the skin of anyone who came into contact with it.  I suspect that Cain would like to restart slavery, but this time for all Americans.  Why else would he be planning this sort of prison state, big government, big brother scheme. 

Naturally, such a fence is moronic, especially with constant news of smugglers tunnelling under existing fences.  Electric fences are very old and very bad technology.  It would certainly fry a lot of tumbleweeds and jack rabbits, etc.  However, it is unlikely that it would present much obstruction to a human who understands how to use an insulated fiberglass ladder to cross it harmlessly, or how to use an electrical conductor to short it out.  The reason these things are not widespread is because they don't work. 

So now Cain says he was just joking.  Apparently he thinks that his race makes him immune from charges of racism when joking about other minorities, like Mexican Americans.  Perhaps what he is really afraid of is that Mexican immigrants tend to be highly religious, and therefore, as Satan incarnate, he wants to keep as many of them out as possible, by any means necessary. 

More Evidence that Cain is the Antichrist from Medieval Art

It's interesting that, since Herman Cain has come out with his 999 plan, only a tiny number of Christians seem to be concerned about this being the Mark of the Beast.  It's also interesting, that historically, Satan and the Antichrist have been depicted in Medieval Christian art with a dark or black complexion.  Of course, this was used against Obama, but it seems to apply more aptly to Cain, since he is the one using a variant of 666 in his central campaign pledge.  Republican were absolutely convinced that Obama was the Antichrist on the basis of complexion alone.  Yet they are falling all over themselves to embrace Herman Cain who far better matches descriptions of the Antichrist with his arrogant, blasphemous speech and his unshakable faith in money, rather than God, as the savior of Mankind.